TOP LATEST FIVE CASE LAWS FOR THE BAIL OF SECTION 506 PPC URBAN NEWS

Top latest Five case laws for the bail of section 506 ppc Urban news

Top latest Five case laws for the bail of section 506 ppc Urban news

Blog Article

However, the above observation is without prejudice on the legal rights with the parties, arising out with the over marriage with the couple, if any, pending before the competent court of legislation. Read more

Case legislation is specific on the jurisdiction in which it was rendered. For instance, a ruling in the California appellate court would not ordinarily be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is a free and democratic place, and once a person becomes a major she or he can marry whosoever he/she likes; if the parents on the boy or Female will not approve of this sort of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they are able to do if they're able to cut off social relations with the son or perhaps the daughter, Nevertheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes this sort of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Female that is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or person who's a major, the pair is neither harassed by anyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who gives these types of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to job by instituting criminal proceedings through the police against these persons and further stern action is taken against these person(s) as provided by law.

The necessary analysis (called ratio decidendi), then constitutes a precedent binding on other courts; further analyses not strictly necessary towards the determination in the current case are called obiter dicta, which constitute persuasive authority but usually are not technically binding. By contrast, decisions in civil regulation jurisdictions are generally shorter, referring only to statutes.[four]

149 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 from the Constitution based within the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued on the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement during the FIR lodged by FIA and within the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.

As being the Supreme Court will be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been achieved, therefore the decision from the Supreme Court needs for being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) of your Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airways Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, if a petitioner was acquitted in the criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. 20/2011, this does not automatically result in exoneration from departmental charges based over the same factual grounds. Whilst a writ under Article 199 is available in specific limited situations, it is actually generally not the suitable remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full chance to cross-examine witnesses and present his/her defense but didn't persuade the department of his/her innocence.

11 . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is really a free and democratic country, and once a person becomes a major they can marry whosoever he/she likes; In case the parents in the boy or Woman don't approve of these inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they're able to do if they might cut off social relations with the son or the daughter, Nonetheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl who is major undergoes inter-caste or website inter-religious marriage with a woman or man who is a major, the pair is neither harassed by anybody nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who gives this kind of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to endeavor by instituting criminal proceedings with the police against these types of persons and further stern action is taken against these person(s) as provided by legislation.

10. Without touching the merits with the case in the issue of once-a-year increases from the pensionary emoluments from the petitioner, in terms of policy decision of the provincial government, this sort of yearly increase, if permissible within the case of employees of KMC, demands further assessment being made through the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance as a result of funding issues and insufficient adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, requiring the petitioner to pursue other legal avenues. Read more

This Court may perhaps interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer within a way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the summary or finding arrived at by the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the summary or finding is which include no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court may well interfere with the summary or maybe the finding and mould the relief to really make it appropriate to the facts of each and every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-respect the evidence or perhaps the nature of punishment. On the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified via the decision with the Supreme Court within the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 337 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

Under Article 199, the court possesses the authority to review government procedures for reasonableness if applicable in respondent university also to safeguard aggrieved parties' rights. Therefore, this petition is admissible based on proven court precedents, as well as respondents' objections are overruled. Read more

In 1997, the boy was placed into the home of John and Jane Roe to be a foster child. Although the few experienced two young children of their own at home, the social worker did not inform them about the boy’s history of both being abused, and abusing other children. When she made her report to your court the following working day, the worker reported the boy’s placement within the Roe’s home, but didn’t mention that the few experienced youthful children.

Because the Supreme Court will be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been arrived at, therefore the decision on the Supreme Court needs to generally be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) with the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

refers to law that arrives from decisions made by judges in previous cases. Case regulation, also known as “common regulation,” and “case precedent,” offers a common contextual background for certain legal concepts, And just how they are applied in certain types of case.

Report this page